2025-12-04 Daily DC Test Results: Success!

by Alex Johnson 43 views

Let's dive into the Daily DC Test Results for December 4, 2025! We're excited to share a comprehensive overview of the day's performance, ensuring everything is running smoothly on the Adobe platform. This report provides a detailed look at the tests conducted, their outcomes, and key metrics that help us maintain optimal performance and reliability.

Test Summary: A Day of Success

Our test summary gives you the highlights of the day. Keeping a close eye on these metrics ensures we're delivering the best possible experience. We're thrilled to report a complete success for today's tests!

  • ENVIRONMENT: PROD 🏭
    • This indicates that the tests were conducted in the production environment, mirroring the live user experience. Testing in the production environment provides the most accurate assessment of how the system performs under real-world conditions. It helps identify potential issues that might not be apparent in staging or development environments, ensuring that users have a seamless experience. Regular testing in the production environment is crucial for maintaining the stability and reliability of the platform.
  • Status: SUCCESS ✅
    • A resounding success! All tests passed, indicating a stable and well-performing environment. This status provides assurance that the system is functioning as expected and that there are no major issues affecting performance or functionality. It reflects the effectiveness of the testing processes and the overall health of the platform. Consistent success in tests is a positive sign of a reliable system.
  • Start Time: 12/4/2025, 7:25:49 AM
    • The tests kicked off bright and early, ensuring timely detection of any potential issues. Knowing the start time helps in tracking the testing schedule and identifying any delays or discrepancies. It also aids in correlating test results with other system events that might have occurred around the same time. Precise start times are essential for maintaining a chronological record of testing activities.
  • Duration: 7 minutes
    • The entire suite of tests was completed swiftly, minimizing any potential impact on system resources. The duration of the tests is an important metric for assessing the efficiency of the testing process. Shorter test durations minimize the impact on system resources and allow for more frequent testing cycles. Optimizing the duration of tests is crucial for maintaining a streamlined testing process.
  • Workflow: View Details
    • Follow the link to GitHub for an in-depth look at the testing workflow. This link provides transparency into the testing process and allows stakeholders to review the specific steps and configurations used. It enables detailed analysis of the test execution and helps in identifying areas for improvement. Access to workflow details is essential for maintaining a transparent and collaborative testing environment.
  • Total Tests: 27
    • A comprehensive set of tests were conducted, covering various aspects of the system. The total number of tests reflects the breadth of the testing effort and the level of scrutiny applied to the system. A higher number of tests typically indicates a more thorough assessment of system functionality and performance. This metric helps in gauging the comprehensiveness of the testing process.
  • Passed: 27 ✅
    • Every single test passed, a testament to the stability and reliability of our platform. This is a critical metric that directly reflects the health of the system. Passing all tests indicates that the system is functioning as expected and that there are no major issues affecting its performance or functionality. It provides confidence in the reliability of the platform.
  • Failed: 0 ❌
    • Zero failures! This indicates that the system is performing flawlessly. A failure rate of zero is the ideal outcome of any testing process. It signifies that the system is stable and reliable, and that there are no critical issues requiring immediate attention. This metric is a key indicator of the overall quality of the system.
  • Success Rate: 100.00%
    • An impeccable success rate demonstrates the robustness of our testing and infrastructure. A 100% success rate is a testament to the effectiveness of the testing methodologies and the stability of the system. It indicates that the system is performing optimally and that there are no significant issues affecting its performance. This metric is a strong indicator of the reliability and quality of the platform.
  • Total URLs: 27
    • The total number of URLs tested, ensuring comprehensive coverage of our web presence. This metric provides insight into the scope of the testing process. It indicates the number of web pages and resources that were subjected to testing, ensuring that all critical areas of the website are functioning correctly. Monitoring the total number of URLs tested helps in maintaining comprehensive test coverage.
  • Total Links Validated: 2169
    • A significant number of links were validated, ensuring seamless navigation and user experience. This metric reflects the thoroughness of the link validation process. It indicates the number of hyperlinks that were checked for validity, ensuring that users can navigate the website without encountering broken links or errors. Validating a large number of links is essential for maintaining a positive user experience.
  • 404 Errors: 0
    • No broken links were found, maintaining a smooth user journey. The absence of 404 errors is a key indicator of website quality. It signifies that all links are functioning correctly and that users are not encountering broken pages. This metric is crucial for maintaining a seamless user experience and ensuring that users can access the information they need.
  • 999 Errors: 16
    • While 999 errors were detected, these are being investigated to ensure optimal performance. Although not ideal, identifying these errors is part of our commitment to continuous improvement. The detection of 999 errors indicates potential issues that require further investigation. While these errors do not necessarily signify critical failures, they warrant attention to ensure optimal system performance and user experience. Addressing these errors promptly is essential for maintaining the reliability of the platform.

Test Results Details: A Deep Dive

Our test results details table provides a granular view of each URL tested. We look at the status, duration, page load times, and link validation to ensure each page performs optimally.

URL Status Duration (ms) Page Load Total Links Valid Links 404 Errors
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat.html ✅ 51537 200 111 105 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/acrobat-pro.html ✅ 65362 N/A 106 99 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/acrobat-standard.html ✅ 66699 N/A 107 100 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/business.html ✅ 29440 200 102 94 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/business/pricing-plans.html ✅ 28581 200 106 98 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/business/pricing/plans.html ✅ 18788 200 46 42 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/business/sign.html ✅ 22390 200 101 93 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/campaign/acrobats-got-it.html ✅ 20635 200 60 57 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/complete-pdf-solution.html ✅ 33447 200 46 42 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/complete-pdf-solution.html?ttid=edit-pdf ✅ 63254 N/A 46 43 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/features.html ✅ 35915 200 104 97 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/features/export-pdf.html ✅ 35927 200 108 101 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/features/modify-pdfs.html ✅ 39108 200 106 100 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/free-trial-download.html ✅ 21961 200 88 82 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/generative-ai-pdf.html ✅ 44781 200 112 106 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/generative-ai-pdf/students.html ✅ 24005 200 91 86 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/online.html ✅ 14533 200 62 60 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/online/ai-chat-pdf.html ✅ 19512 200 69 67 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/online/compress-pdf.html ✅ 46237 N/A 69 67 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/online/merge-pdf.html ✅ 46022 N/A 69 67 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/online/pdf-editor.html ✅ 19919 200 70 68 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/online/pdf-to-word.html ✅ 43152 N/A 68 66 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/pdf-reader.html ✅ 50752 200 115 107 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/pricing.html ✅ 18389 200 42 39 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/pricing/business.html ✅ 20405 200 46 43 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/pricing/compare-versions.html ✅ 26330 200 89 84 0
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/pricing/students.html ✅ 18270 200 30 26 0

Each row in this table represents a URL that was tested as part of our daily DC test suite. The columns provide specific details about the test results for each URL, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the system's performance and reliability.

  • URL: This column lists the specific URL that was tested. Each URL represents a different page or resource within the Adobe ecosystem, ensuring that a wide range of functionalities and content are validated. The URLs cover various aspects of Adobe products and services, including product pages, feature descriptions, pricing information, and online tools. Testing a diverse set of URLs helps in identifying potential issues across the platform.
  • Status: The status column indicates whether the test for the given URL passed or failed. A ✅ symbol signifies a successful test, indicating that the URL is functioning as expected. A ❌ symbol would indicate a failed test, which would require further investigation. The status is a critical indicator of the health of each individual page and resource within the system. Consistently passing tests across all URLs is essential for maintaining a reliable user experience.
  • Duration (ms): This column shows the time taken, in milliseconds, to load and execute the test for the URL. The duration is an important performance metric that reflects the responsiveness of the page. Lower durations are generally preferred, as they indicate faster loading times and a better user experience. Monitoring the duration helps in identifying potential performance bottlenecks and optimizing page load times. Significant variations in duration can highlight areas that require further attention.
  • Page Load: The Page Load column indicates the HTTP status code returned when the URL was accessed. A status code of 200 signifies a successful page load, indicating that the server responded correctly. Other status codes, such as 404 (Not Found) or 500 (Internal Server Error), would indicate issues that need to be addressed. The page load status is a fundamental indicator of the accessibility and availability of the URL. Consistent 200 status codes across all URLs are essential for ensuring a seamless user experience.
  • Total Links: This column displays the total number of links present on the tested URL. The total number of links provides insight into the complexity and interconnectedness of the page. It helps in understanding the scope of link validation required for each URL. Monitoring the total number of links is useful for ensuring comprehensive link coverage during testing.
  • Valid Links: The Valid Links column shows the number of links on the page that were found to be working correctly. This metric is crucial for maintaining a positive user experience, as broken links can lead to frustration and lost engagement. A high number of valid links indicates that the page is well-maintained and that users can navigate the website without encountering errors. Regularly validating links and ensuring a high count of valid links is essential for website quality.
  • 404 Errors: This column indicates the number of broken links (404 errors) found on the page. A 404 error signifies that a linked resource could not be found on the server. The presence of 404 errors can negatively impact user experience and SEO. Ideally, this number should be zero, indicating that all links on the page are functioning correctly. Monitoring and promptly addressing 404 errors is crucial for maintaining a user-friendly and effective website.

In Conclusion

Today's Daily DC Test Results showcase a successful day for the Adobe platform. Our commitment to rigorous testing ensures we deliver a reliable and seamless experience for our users.

For more in-depth information about web testing and quality assurance, visit OWASP (Open Web Application Security Project). This trusted resource offers a wealth of knowledge and best practices for ensuring web application security and performance.

Last updated: 2025-12-04T07:33:27.975Z Generated by Daily DC Tests workflow